Without an e-discovery solution, it’s time consuming and expensive to find the right digital data assets among the millions of items that enterprises have stored. Often, the volume of the final dataset is not known at the start of the project, and so-called “smoking guns,” or relevant items of information that no one knew existed, may be discovered during litigation, landing the organization in trouble and resulting in larger fines or settlements.

For that reason, it’s in the best interest of organizations to have an e-discovery solution already in place when a request is received. This proactive measure allows organizations the time to properly compare solutions well before the need for one becomes critical, ensuring they invest in a solution that best meets their requirements.

E-discovery solutions accelerate the search for and retrieval of assets. The increasing use of automation for tasks such as review, redaction, and tagging reduces the manual effort required and helps deliver depositions to opposing counsel, a court, or regulator in a shorter time frame. By helping organizations to address access requests and prepare for litigation more quickly, e-discovery solutions can also reduce the cost of the e-discovery process.

E-discovery solutions follow the electronic discovery reference model (EDRM), a framework that defines all of the stages of e-discovery, from identifying needed data to presenting it to a court. Some solutions provide end-to-end capabilities, while others stick to either the initial stages (identification, preservation, collection, and processing) or the later stages of the model (review, analysis, production, and presentation).

There are two distinct audiences that e-discovery software must support: organizations that undertake the initial searches for data that may be relevant to a case or matter, and legal teams—either legal departments within large enterprises or law firms—responsible for reviewing and putting together the final dataset of content.

This is our third year evaluating the e-discovery space in the context of our Key Criteria and Radar reports. This report builds on our previous analysis and considers how the market has evolved over the last year.

This GigaOm Radar report examines 19 of the top e-discovery solutions and compares offerings against the capabilities (table stakes, key features, and emerging features) and nonfunctional requirements (business criteria) outlined in the companion Key Criteria report. Together, these reports provide an overview of the market, identify leading e-discovery offerings, and help decision-makers evaluate these solutions so they can make a more informed investment decision.

The post GigaOm Radar for E-Discovery appeared first on Gigaom.

The Genesis of Digital Experience Platforms

The roots of DXPs can be traced back to the late 1980s when the World Wide Web emerged. Initially, websites were static, providing information that didn’t change. However, by the late 1990s, the development of the Document Object Model (DOM) allowed content updates, albeit still requiring developer intervention.

Fast forward to the turn of the century, and web content management (WCM) vendors began offering solutions for creating and centrally managing multiple websites. These platforms allowed non-technical users to publish content dynamically using templates. However, true interactivity was still limited.

Limited analytics allowed marketers to gather basic customer data from website engagements including the journey through the website, key clicks, abandoned visits, and the route to a sale, enabling marketers to make offers based on pages viewed. Aggregating this data provided the number of hits per page, most and least popular pages, and patterns in abandoned visits—a sign that the site had an issue. Limited customer profiles were possible for known visitors, enabling personalization at a basic level.

A/B testing was another innovation during this time, allowing marketers to experiment with different content variations to discover which was the most successful and likely to produce the most sales.

From Web Content Management to Digital Experience Platforms

Many WCM solutions became part of larger enterprise content management (ECM) portfolios of content management solutions. However, by 2015, these mega-platforms had become too big and unruly to implement and manage easily, so the vendors started to break them down, separating their WCM solutions. Within a few years, DXP was born.

Here’s what sets DXPs apart:

• Holistic customer experiences: DXPs go beyond website management. They enable seamless experiences across all digital touchpoints, including websites, mobile apps, social media, and more. Marketers can create consistent, personalized journeys for users, enhancing brand loyalty and engagement.

• Headless architecture: DXPs embrace a headless approach, separating content from the application layer. Content becomes reusable and can be delivered to multiple channels and devices, ensuring flexibility and scalability.

• Data-driven insights: DXPs collect valuable data on user behavior, preferences, and interactions. Marketers gain insights to tailor content, optimize campaigns, and drive conversions.

• Content creation and collaboration: DXPs empower both creative teams and marketers to create and publish content effortlessly. Intuitive interfaces allow rapid content development and deployment.

The Power of Personalization

DXPs enable hyper-personalization. Imagine a user visiting your website—a DXP can dynamically serve content based on their past interactions, preferences, and demographics.

Here’s how DXPs enhance personalization:

• Segmentation and targeting: DXPs analyze user data to create segments (by interests, location, or behavior, for example). Targeted content resonates better with specific audiences.

• A/B testing: Marketers experiment with different content variations to identify what resonates best. DXPs provide insights into which version drives more engagement or conversions.

• Real-time optimization: DXPs adapt content in real time based on user behavior. Imagine a personalized homepage that changes as the user navigates.

2024 Is the Year of GenAI

DXPs continue to evolve, integrating AI, machine learning, and omnichannel capabilities. Last year, many vendors experimented with GenAI to generate text and images from written instructions. The next 12 months will be the year of implementing the technology for business benefits in areas like process automation, conversational assistants that can perform tasks dynamically, and interacting with IoT devices to react to real-time events to ensure optimized performance.

As businesses strive to deliver exceptional digital experiences, DXPs will remain at the forefront of marketing transformation.

Navigating the Future with Headless DXPs

As enterprises sail through the ever-changing tides of technology, one thing is clear: future-proofing is essential. Therefore, a DXP should be on the shopping list of every business that wants to create personalized experiences across various channels. Let’s chart our course and explore what enterprises should do to stay ahead:

• Embrace headless DXPs: Headless architecture is the compass guiding modern DXPs. It separates content from presentation, allowing flexibility and scalability. With a headless DXP, content resides in a repository, ready to be reused across multiple channels and applications.

• Build roadmaps and have strategy discussions: Engage in candid conversations with DXP vendors. Explore their roadmaps and product development plans. Understand their vision for the future. Are they aligning with emerging technologies? Look for clarity and transparency.

• Follow the AI North Star: Seek vendors that infuse AI into their DXPs. Imagine predictive analytics, personalized recommendations, and automated content delivery—all powered by AI.

• Dive into use cases: How can a headless DXP benefit your enterprise? Picture seamless customer journeys, dynamic content delivery, and real-time personalization.

In summary, set sail with a headless DXP, navigate strategic discussions, and keep an eye on AI innovations. The horizon is bright, and the journey promises transformative experiences for your enterprise.

Next Steps

To learn more, take a look at GigaOm’s DXP Key Criteria and Radar reports. These reports provide a comprehensive overview of the market, outline the criteria you’ll want to consider in a purchase decision, and evaluate how a number of vendors perform against those decision criteria.

• GigaOm Key Criteria for Evaluating Digital Experience Platforms (DXPs)
• GigaOm Radar for Digital Experience Platforms (DXPs)

If you’re not yet a GigaOm subscriber, sign up here.

The post Digital Experience Platforms: Transforming Marketing in the 21st Century appeared first on Gigaom.

E-discovery solutions generally follow the electronic discovery reference model (EDRM), which lays down a logical framework for e-discovery. This is used by vendors when developing their products and by enterprises when planning e-discovery projects. The EDRM has multiple stages, and although it follows a linear path from start to finish, most of the stages are iterative, and enterprises can move backward as well as forward through the stages. E-discovery products that follow the EDRM should provide all of the capabilities required to manage the e-discovery process regardless of the scope of the matter. These can include data governance, retention, protection, replication, and secure deletion of nonprotected content. The system should be configurable to consume data in a nonrepudiated form with a full chain of custody.

Any data that may be required for any current or future discovery needs may require a legal hold to be applied to enable replicating and protection from deletion. Once data is no longer needed, it must be securely erased following appropriate governance policies. In addition to protecting the data, the system must also make it searchable and easy for legal staff to use, providing the ability to redact content not required in the legal discovery process.

The e-discovery market is mature, with the majority of vendors well-established. There is some consolidation as a small number of vendors acquire competitors to strengthen their capabilities in previously weak areas. This is evident in cases where vendors are expanding their capabilities from supporting half of the EDRM to providing end-to-end capabilities.

Business Imperative
E-discovery has become increasingly important over the past few years, as companies and individuals have become more litigious and increasing legislation and resulting regulations around the world dictate that digital data should be discoverable.

With data volumes growing exponentially and comprising much of the evidence in litigation and other discovery requests, it has become impossible to address those requests using standard software such as search tools. Discovery can involve finding the proverbial needle in the haystack, often searching millions of items of content to find a single file or small group of them, so specialized e-discovery tools have become a “must-have” for enterprises handling discovery requests.

Sector Adoption Score
To help executives and decision-makers assess the potential impact and value of an e-discovery solution deployment to the business, this GigaOm Key Criteria report provides a structured assessment of the sector across five factors: benefit, maturity, urgency, impact, and effort. By scoring each factor based on how strongly it compels or deters adoption of an e-discovery solution, we provide an overall Sector Adoption Score (Figure 1) of 4.4 out of 5, with 5 indicating the strongest possible recommendation to adopt. This indicates that an e-discovery solution is a credible candidate for deployment and worthy of thoughtful consideration.

The factors contributing to the Sector Adoption Score for e-discovery are explained in more detail in the Sector Brief section that follows.